• Big Changes Are Coming for 2026 Medicare Plans. What You Need to Know.

    Skinnier benefits, higher premiums and fewer options mean more than a million seniors should shop for new coverage during open enrollment

    Illustration of pills with dollar signs.

    Alexandra Citrin-Safadi/WSJ

    Last year, seniors picking Medicare coverage faced some tough choices. This year might be even worse.

    The enrollment period for 2026 Medicare coverage starts Wednesday, and it is likely to be a difficult one for many enrollees. For the second year in a row, big Medicare insurers are getting rid of some plans, trimming popular benefits and increasing out-of-pocket costs such as deductibles.

    The upshot: Seniors have to be careful, or they might end up with a bad surprise such as higher drug costs or the loss of a favorite doctor.

    “This year is a nightmare,” said Marcia Mantell, a retirement-planning consultant. Medicare enrollees “have to know more than they ever have had to know…it’s all the hidden stuff,” she said.

    Behind the turmoil are business realities. Medicare insurers have seen their profits squeezed by higher-than-expected medical spending and regulatory changes. Now, some of the biggest are trying to improve their margins by dumping unprofitable products and by controlling costs better.

    The moves might make their products less appealing. The industry is projecting that enrollment in private Medicare plans, known as Medicare Advantage, will shrink in 2026. That would be the first time in 15 years, according to the health researcher KFF.

    “What many of the companies have talked about is really pricing for profitability rather than for growth,” said Lisa Gill, a senior analyst at J.P. Morgan.

    Here’s what you need to know about navigating this year’s Medicare enrollment pitfalls.

    Read more …

  • A Boy, His Dog and His Dad: A Heavenly Tale

    My father said he’d never find a pooch as good as Rudy in his lifetime. Days later, they were both gone.

    My father succumbed to advanced heart failure earlier this month. He died in hospice surrounded by family, a tender mercy. After a life spent teaching me how to live well, in the end, he taught me how to die well. He was 79.

    It’s funny what you recall in that moment. I remembered his recent visit to my home in Charlotte, N.C. He had come to sponsor my teenage son Finn as he received the sacrament of Confirmation, a Catholic rite of adolescence.

    image

    Mike Kerrigan’s father, Michael James Kerrigan. Photo: Donna Kerrigan

    Noticing my dad’s pace had slowed, I suggested he get a dog for light exercise and companionship. As if on cue, Rudy, my aged Cavalier King Charles Spaniel, gingerly sidled up to him.

    Though Rudy was deaf and blind, he always retained his breed’s amiability. My dad demurred, suggesting he’d never find a dog as good as Rudy in this lifetime. I didn’t press it further.

    Just after my dad went to hospice, I called my wife, Devin, to update her. She gave me sobering news of her own: Rudy had gone into the backyard to die. This happened while my dad was in the transport ambulance.

    Faith—along with my mother’s inspired unwillingness to leave his side—had sustained me through my father’s final weeks. Yet the news about Rudy knocked me to my knees.

    The timing of my pet’s death seemed cruel. But like stepping back from a pointillist painting, the beauty of what was unraveling didn’t hit me until two days later, when dad died.

    It was then I recalled our conversation about dogs. It seems my father and my pooch, two savvy schemers, had hatched a plan back in Charlotte.

    Rudy, the dog my dad couldn’t ever hope to find, would become his companion after all—only not in this lifetime. The two old souls would meet God together, with Rudy walking slightly out in front. I see the beauty now. Rudy’s work on earth was done. So was my father’s, a sly teacher of life lessons to the end, who outfoxed me one final time.

    Mr. Kerrigan is an attorney in Charlotte, N.C.

    https://www.wsj.com/opinion/a-boy-his-dog-and-his-dad-a-heavenly-tale-c65bd7b9?st=gZWWSK&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

  • PSA from DFW Enterprises:

    Everybody who wears glasses knows the problem: They fog up when you’re also wearing a mask. That’s not only an inconvenience, but it can also be a safety hazard.

    Here is a simple way to clear things up by absorbing the fog-inducing moisture from your breath.

    Fold a tissue
    Fold a tissue or napkin lengthwise at about one-inch intervals. Five or six folds should do.

    Line the mask
    Use the tissue to line the back of the mask along the top edge. Hold the tissue in place with your thumb and forefinger.

    Put on the mask
    Anchor the bottom of the mask on your chin, then pull the top up beneath your eyes with the tissue in place. Try not to touch your face while putting the mask on. Pull the straps over the back of your ears, and adjust the mask to make sure it fits snugly.

    Try it out
    Put on your glasses and test out the anti-fog effectiveness of the tissue strip. Some adjusting of the nose guard might be necessary. Another solution is to wash your glasses before applying a mask. Do this with soap and water to create a surfactant film on the lenses, which will resist moisture.

    To read this Wall Street Journal article, please click (HERE):

  • New research shows how crucial friendship is not only for happiness and emotional well-being, but physical health too, a new book reveals

    PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES

    For many of us, the top of our life priority list might look something like this: family, work—maybe exercise. Time with friends can sometimes end up near the bottom.

    That’s a mistake, says Lydia Denworth, a science journalist and the author of the new book “Friendship,” which was published last month by W.W. Norton & Co. Ms. Denworth interviews animal biologists studying baboons and rhesus macaque monkeys, anthropologists and neuroscientists to uncover just how important friendship is not only for happiness and emotional health, but, she argues, physical health, too. In fact, friends are key to our very survival, Ms. Denworth asserts.

    Lydia Denworth, author of the new book, ‘Friendship,’ is a science journalist.

    PHOTO: JESSICA BARTHEL

    Here are edited excerpts from an interview.

    To read the rest of this story, please click (HERE):

  • Even Joe Biden would raise the top marginal rate on work to over 50%

    The brawl in President Obama’s second term over raising the top income-tax rate to 39.6% from 35% was centuries ago in political time. One way to tell is that even moderate Democratic 2020 presidential candidates have quietly proposed to raise the tax rate on labor by double digits and it’s received almost no attention. Unlike single-payer health care and wealth taxes, this tax increase could command majority support in a Democratic Congress on day one.

    The idea is to increase the Social Security payroll tax, the 12.4% levy that falls directly on labor and is not eligible for deductions. Currently the tax applies to income up to $137,700, split between employer and employee. Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar want to impose it on all labor income above $250,000. Joe Biden wants it to fall on income above $400,000. Pete Buttigieg says he wants “additional Social Security taxes” on income above $250,000.

    Meanwhile, Representative John Larson’s Social Security 2100 Act, cosponsored by 208 House Democrats, would apply the tax to income above $400,000 to finance an expansion of the entitlement. The bill would also gradually raise the payroll tax rate on all workers to 14.8% from 12.4%. As entitlement watcher Charles Blahous notes, that’s a 19% increase in the payroll tax burden. That’s significant for less-skilled workers who don’t earn enough or have too many dependents to pay income tax.

    Raising rates on high earners may be less politically toxic but it’s terrible economics. Experts can debate how much the top rate affects the incentive to work for, say, a dentist or an engineer, and whether a two, three or five percentage-point tax-rate increase has an effect on the wider economy. But there’s little doubt a new 12.4% tax would depress incentives and reduce America’s competitive advantage for high-skilled workers and make the tax structure more typical of European countries.

    The nearby table borrowed from our friends at Cornerstone Macro captures the magnitude of the tax increases on labor and investment income that Democratic presidential candidates are proposing. The top marginal federal tax rate on labor is currently about 40% including the Medicare tax.

    To continue reading this story, please click (HERE):

  • Director Sam Mendes’s film uses an edgy cinematic technique to follow a pair of soldiers through the horrors of the Great War


    George MacKay, center, as Schofield in ‘1917,’ directed by Sam Mendes.
     UNIVERSAL PICTURES

     

    George MacKay is a veteran of war on screen. The 27-year-old actor has played a soldier or veteran seven times in movies and television over the years, including World War II and Afghanistan fighters. Now he has his third role set in World War I, but the biggest of his career so far. As a stoic English infantryman saddled with an impossible mission, he helps carry the new movie “1917,” a Golden Globes nominee opening on Christmas.

    “Maybe it’s that sort of juxtaposition,” says Mr. MacKay, a Brit with soft eyes and a sharp chin, reflecting on why so many filmmakers have seen a soldier in him. “Being the baby-faced fella in that awful landscape, or being a gentle man doing violent things.”

    His “1917” co-star Dean-Charles Chapman, fresh from his role as an ineffectual prince in Netflix’s recent Shakespeare adaptation “The King,” is 22 years old and best known for playing a doomed boy-king in “Game of Thrones.” Together the actors are the sole focus of “1917,” which was filmed and edited to play as a single, uninterrupted camera shot. It follows a pair of foot soldiers sent to prevent 1,600 of their distant comrades—including the brother of Mr. Chapman’s character—from charging into a German ambush.

    “1917” was directed by Sam Mendes, who drew inspiration from his grandfather, a messenger on the Western Front when he was a teen. With Krysty Wilson-Cairns, Mr. Mendes also wrote the film, which features cinematography by Roger Deakins. The movie, by attaching itself completely to the two lance corporals as they hurtle through crowded trenches, across a hellish no-man’s-land, and into enemy territory beyond, has a scale that shifts between intimate and epic.

    To continue reading this story, please click (HERE) to go to the Wall Street Journal

  • Experience and tradition are essential for great food—but being ready to experiment is a big help too

    ILLUSTRATION: MITCH BLUNT
     

    Is cooking a science? For years, many home cooks—myself included—would have said no. A kitchen is a place we go in search of warmth and coziness. I used to find the idea of treating this homely space as some kind of high-tech laboratory slightly off-putting.

    But there are signs that more home cooks are embracing science in the kitchen. The other day, while browsing for food books, I noticed that “The Food Lab: Better Home Cooking Through Science,” by J. Kenji López-Alt, had overtaken the 2019 edition of “The Joy of Cooking” in the number of customer reviews it had received on Amazon, with an average rating of five stars.

    Ratings aren’t everything, but this is surely a sign that thousands of home cooks now see scientific cooking as a positive thing, giving us the tools to produce everyday dishes in a more delicious or reliable way. If science can help us make a meat loaf that won’t fall apart (gelatin is the secret ingredient) or produce lighter waffles (by adding club soda), then what’s not to like?

    To continue reading this story, click (HERE) to go to the Wall Street Journal